0.008 intermediate diff = assymetrical?
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Member
- Posts: 111
- Joined: January 28th, 2010, 3:15 pm
- Preferred Company: free agent
0.008 intermediate diff = assymetrical?
i recall another post that broke down how low the intermediate differential of a ball can go before you treat it as a symmetrical ball. does anyone have an idea of what 0.008 int diff would be considered?
-
- Trusted Source
- Posts: 3174
- Joined: January 18th, 2010, 9:21 pm
Re: 0.008 intermediate diff = assymetrical?
Asymmetrical. I think that is what the Mojave has. From what I remember the break-off is at .007militant02 wrote:i recall another post that broke down how low the intermediate differential of a ball can go before you treat it as a symmetrical ball. does anyone have an idea of what 0.008 int diff would be considered?
I think a wt hole will still move a .008 a little though. The break-off for it not moving is at around .020
- Mo Pinel
- Rest In Peace
- Posts: 10054
- Joined: January 26th, 2010, 6:10 pm
- Preferred Company: MoRich, & now RADICAL BT
- Location: Richmond, VA
Re: 0.008 intermediate diff = assymetrical?
Borderline, but just asymmetrical.militant02 wrote:i recall another post that broke down how low the intermediate differential of a ball can go before you treat it as a symmetrical ball. does anyone have an idea of what 0.008 int diff would be considered?
Rest In Peace (1942-2021)
-
- Member
- Posts: 111
- Joined: January 28th, 2010, 3:15 pm
- Preferred Company: free agent
Re: 0.008 intermediate diff = assymetrical?
ok, thanks. one other question, since the distance from the pin to pap has a different effect with asymmetrical balls versus symmetrical does this effect increase the higher the mass bias value increase?
- Mo Pinel
- Rest In Peace
- Posts: 10054
- Joined: January 26th, 2010, 6:10 pm
- Preferred Company: MoRich, & now RADICAL BT
- Location: Richmond, VA
Re: 0.008 intermediate diff = assymetrical?
militant02 wrote:ok, thanks. one other question, since the distance from the pin to pap has a different effect with asymmetrical balls versus symmetrical does this effect increase the higher the mass bias value increase?
Pretty much treat it like an asym. flaring ball with intermediate diffs. .007". I treat everything under that as symmetrical.
Rest In Peace (1942-2021)
Re: 0.008 intermediate diff = assymetrical?
Questions:
1) If one were to have a 4+" Pin-to-PAP on a low asym (.007 or lower) and placed the PSA near the thumb with a large DT weight hole, would the flaring properties change at some point? I know the DT weight hole will increase the total diff., so it will flare more anyhow. But will it lose one of its stable axes to begin flaring like an asym?
2) You (Mo) told me recently that the reason asyms and syms flare differently is that syms have 2 stable axes (Pin 6 3/4" from PAP and Pin on PAP) compared to asyms, which only have one (Pin on PAP). Because all drilled balls are asym, does that mean the second axis' stability is a function of the intermediate diff. (or diff. ratio, perhaps)? That is, is the axis only "stable enough" with intermediate diffs. .007 or less? Beyond that, does it become more and more unstable? For instance, will a ball with an EZ Rev core be more unlike a sym than a 607A or even a 715T?
Thanks as always!
1) If one were to have a 4+" Pin-to-PAP on a low asym (.007 or lower) and placed the PSA near the thumb with a large DT weight hole, would the flaring properties change at some point? I know the DT weight hole will increase the total diff., so it will flare more anyhow. But will it lose one of its stable axes to begin flaring like an asym?
2) You (Mo) told me recently that the reason asyms and syms flare differently is that syms have 2 stable axes (Pin 6 3/4" from PAP and Pin on PAP) compared to asyms, which only have one (Pin on PAP). Because all drilled balls are asym, does that mean the second axis' stability is a function of the intermediate diff. (or diff. ratio, perhaps)? That is, is the axis only "stable enough" with intermediate diffs. .007 or less? Beyond that, does it become more and more unstable? For instance, will a ball with an EZ Rev core be more unlike a sym than a 607A or even a 715T?
Thanks as always!
- Mo Pinel
- Rest In Peace
- Posts: 10054
- Joined: January 26th, 2010, 6:10 pm
- Preferred Company: MoRich, & now RADICAL BT
- Location: Richmond, VA
Re: 0.008 intermediate diff = assymetrical?
Answers in white above.The Kid wrote:Questions:
1) If one were to have a 4+" Pin-to-PAP on a low asym (.007 or lower) and placed the PSA near the thumb with a large DT weight hole, would the flaring properties change at some point? I know the DT weight hole will increase the total diff., so it will flare more anyhow. But will it lose one of its stable axes to begin flaring like an asym? YES! IT'S THE MASS PROPERTIES OF THE DRILLED BALL THAT MATTERS!
2) You (Mo) told me recently that the reason asyms and syms flare differently is that syms have 2 stable axes (Pin 6 3/4" from PAP and Pin on PAP) compared to asyms, which only have one (Pin on PAP). Because all drilled balls are asym, does that mean the second axis' stability is a function of the intermediate diff. (or diff. ratio, perhaps)? YES! That is, is the axis only "stable enough" with intermediate diffs. .007 or less? YES! Beyond that, does it become more and more unstable? YES! For instance, will a ball with an EZ Rev core be more unlike a sym than a 607A or even a 715T? YES!
Thanks as always!
Rest In Peace (1942-2021)
Re: 0.008 intermediate diff = assymetrical?
Cool stuff.
One more:
Seeing as we increase the drilling angle 5* and decrease the VAL angle 5* on a symmetrical ball from an asymmetrical layout due to lower gyroscopic inertia, should we decrease the drilling angle and increase the VAL angle to compensate for extreme asymmetry?
i.e. Comparing a layout for a 916AT (.016/.055) to an Nsane LevRG (.035/.052), [let's assume they're similar enough for comparison] should one alter the LevRG layout because of higher gyroscopic inertia?
One more:
Seeing as we increase the drilling angle 5* and decrease the VAL angle 5* on a symmetrical ball from an asymmetrical layout due to lower gyroscopic inertia, should we decrease the drilling angle and increase the VAL angle to compensate for extreme asymmetry?
i.e. Comparing a layout for a 916AT (.016/.055) to an Nsane LevRG (.035/.052), [let's assume they're similar enough for comparison] should one alter the LevRG layout because of higher gyroscopic inertia?
- Mo Pinel
- Rest In Peace
- Posts: 10054
- Joined: January 26th, 2010, 6:10 pm
- Preferred Company: MoRich, & now RADICAL BT
- Location: Richmond, VA
Re: 0.008 intermediate diff = assymetrical?
The Kid wrote:Cool stuff.
One more:
Seeing as we increase the drilling angle 5* and decrease the VAL angle 5* on a symmetrical ball from an asymmetrical layout due to lower gyroscopic inertia, should we decrease the drilling angle and increase the VAL angle to compensate for extreme asymmetry?
i.e. Comparing a layout for a 916AT (.016/.055) to an Nsane LevRG (.035/.052), [let's assume they're similar enough for comparison] should one alter the LevRG layout because of higher gyroscopic inertia?
Please re-word the question. I'm not following.
Rest In Peace (1942-2021)
- kwettig
- Pro Shop
- Posts: 359
- Joined: November 15th, 2010, 6:57 am
- THS Average: 212
- Positive Axis Point: 4 1/2 over 5/8 up
- Speed: 17
- Rev Rate: 380
- Axis Tilt: 12
- Axis Rotation: 60
- Heavy Oil Ball: Morich DestroyR
- Medium Oil Ball: Morich HookR
- Light Oil Ball: Motiv Venom Strike
- Preferred Company: Morich
- Location: New Richmond WI
Re: 0.008 intermediate diff = assymetrical?
I believe he's asking if we should change the layout for cases of extremely high intermediate differentials as we change the layout for symmetrical equipment. Do we do the opposite as we would for a symmetrical and have a smaller drill angle and a larger val?
So if a symmetrical layout is 60* 30* and a ~.016 int. diff. asym is 55* 35* would a ~.032 int. diff. asym be laid out 50* 40*?
So if a symmetrical layout is 60* 30* and a ~.016 int. diff. asym is 55* 35* would a ~.032 int. diff. asym be laid out 50* 40*?
Kyle Wettig
IBPSIA Adv. Certified Tech.
Breakpoint Pro Shop
New Richmond WI
IBPSIA Adv. Certified Tech.
Breakpoint Pro Shop
New Richmond WI
Re: 0.008 intermediate diff = assymetrical?
I think that about sums it up. My thought process follows this way:
Post-drilled symmetricals have low intermediate differentials. Because of this (I assume), they have lower gyroscopic inertia. Therefore, we add 5* to the drilling angle and take 5* off the VAL angle to cause the ball to lose tilt later.
Post-drilled very asymmetric balls have high intermediate differentials. Because of this (I assume), they have higher gyroscopic inertia. Therefore, we take 5* off the drilling angle and add 5* to the VAL angle to cause the ball to lose tilt sooner.
Perhaps it is inconsequential.
Post-drilled symmetricals have low intermediate differentials. Because of this (I assume), they have lower gyroscopic inertia. Therefore, we add 5* to the drilling angle and take 5* off the VAL angle to cause the ball to lose tilt later.
Post-drilled very asymmetric balls have high intermediate differentials. Because of this (I assume), they have higher gyroscopic inertia. Therefore, we take 5* off the drilling angle and add 5* to the VAL angle to cause the ball to lose tilt sooner.
Perhaps it is inconsequential.
- Mo Pinel
- Rest In Peace
- Posts: 10054
- Joined: January 26th, 2010, 6:10 pm
- Preferred Company: MoRich, & now RADICAL BT
- Location: Richmond, VA
Re: 0.008 intermediate diff = assymetrical?
If you're trying to create identical ball motion, YES! since higher diff. ratio balls transition faster.kwettig wrote:I believe he's asking if we should change the layout for cases of extremely high intermediate differentials as we change the layout for symmetrical equipment. Do we do the opposite as we would for a symmetrical and have a smaller drill angle and a larger val?
So if a symmetrical layout is 60* 30* and a ~.016 int. diff. asym is 55* 35* would a ~.032 int. diff. asym be laid out 50* 40*?
Rest In Peace (1942-2021)
Re: 0.008 intermediate diff = assymetrical?
Is this directly due to gyroscopic inertia?Mo Pinel wrote: If you're trying to create identical ball motion, YES! since higher diff. ratio balls transition faster.
Also, in what way is gyroscopic inertia linked to the Pin-to-Spin line, if at all?
- Mo Pinel
- Rest In Peace
- Posts: 10054
- Joined: January 26th, 2010, 6:10 pm
- Preferred Company: MoRich, & now RADICAL BT
- Location: Richmond, VA
Re: 0.008 intermediate diff = assymetrical?
THE PRECESSIONAL RATE OF THE PAP INCREASES AS IT PASSES THE PIN TO SPIN LINE, THE MINOR AXIS OF THE ELLIPSE!!!!The Kid wrote: Is this directly due to gyroscopic inertia? YES!!!!
Also, in what way is gyroscopic inertia linked to the Pin-to-Spin line, if at all?
Rest In Peace (1942-2021)
Re: 0.008 intermediate diff = assymetrical?
This. Is. Awesome.
- EricHartwell
- Trusted Source
- Posts: 4080
- Joined: April 5th, 2011, 12:24 am
- Positive Axis Point: 4-3/4" and 1/2"up
- Speed: 16 off hand
- Rev Rate: 330
- Axis Tilt: 12
- Axis Rotation: 45
- Heavy Oil Ball: Radical Tremendous, EVO solid, Hammer Obsession
- Medium Oil Ball: EVO pearl, True Motion, Columbia Command, DV8 Intimidator
- Light Oil Ball: Blue Hammer
- Location: Michigan
Re: 0.008 intermediate diff = assymetrical?
Does that mean the flare increases?Mo Pinel wrote: THE PRECESSIONAL RATE OF THE PAP INCREASES AS IT PASSES THE PIN TO SPIN LINE, THE MINOR AXIS OF THE ELLIPSE!!!!
Doesnt the spin also increase after the axis migration passes the pin to spin line?
Eric Hartwell
Right Handed
PAP 4.75" up 1/2"
45* rotation
12* tilt
330 rev rate
16 mph off hand
Right Handed
PAP 4.75" up 1/2"
45* rotation
12* tilt
330 rev rate
16 mph off hand
- Mo Pinel
- Rest In Peace
- Posts: 10054
- Joined: January 26th, 2010, 6:10 pm
- Preferred Company: MoRich, & now RADICAL BT
- Location: Richmond, VA
Re: 0.008 intermediate diff = assymetrical?
The real answer is that the spin rate increases after ball crosses the pin to spin line, which does result in an increase in flare.EricHartwell wrote: Does that mean the flare increases?
Doesnt the spin also increase after the axis migration passes the pin to spin line?
Rest In Peace (1942-2021)
- dougsterner
- BCU Graduate Layouts
- Posts: 282
- Joined: July 4th, 2009, 3:49 am
- THS Average: 209
- Positive Axis Point: 5-1/4 RIGHT 1/2 UP
- Speed: 17 off the hand
- Rev Rate: 325
- Axis Tilt: 11
- Axis Rotation: 30
- Heavy Oil Ball: Swagga
- Medium Oil Ball: First Blood
- Light Oil Ball: Grape Vibe/ Blue Hammer
- Preferred Company: Hammer
- Location: Binghamton, NY
Re: 0.008 intermediate diff = assymetrical?
Wow....I used to think I was a reasonably intelligent guy....until now that is
Doug Sterner
Doug's Pro Shop
Owego, NY
Proudly providing the southern tier of NY with the
best pro shop experience in the area.
Doug's Pro Shop
Owego, NY
Proudly providing the southern tier of NY with the
best pro shop experience in the area.