or maybe because it doesn't act the same no matter how many times you say it. there is a reason you see the top pros throwing urethane and not weak covers with weak layouts with lots of surface and its not because everybody else is less educated than you.MegaMav wrote:
You're not following directions then.
Symmetric, weak cover, weak layout, sanded.
NOT Strong cover, weak layout, sanded.
NOT Weak cover, strong layout, sanded.
NOT Weak cover, benchmark, sanded.
Symmetric, weak cover, weak layout, sanded.
i know mo has said things about this in the past but mo is in the business of selling bowling balls and he does not sell urethane as it is a niche market and 99% of the time the wrong bowling ball on a house shot. I also don't doubt that the brunswick family came out with the true motion to satisfy their pro staff because they didn't get the reaction with other bowling balls no matter how the drilled them
I have plenty of weak covers drilled weak, pearls and solids drilled low flare from most companies except motiv
I love experimenting and have money to burn and most of the balls who aren't in my tournament staple get redrilled a lot for experiments sake. I've also thrown countless of other ppl bowling balls (no thumb luxury) which have loads of different drillings and covers and surfaces as ppl in europe are not afraid of surface since we don't bowl as much as usa on house shots. None has ever reacted anything close to a urethane bowling ball in the front part of the lane.