Drilling strong balls weak vs drilling weak balls strong

Which layout is right for me?

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Mongo
Certified Coach
Certified Coach
Posts: 471
Joined: March 13th, 2014, 5:33 am
THS Average: 225
Positive Axis Point: 4 1/2" over, 1 1/2" up
Speed: 18 MPH
Rev Rate: 375
Axis Tilt: 12
Axis Rotation: 80
Preferred Company: DV8/Radical

Drilling strong balls weak vs drilling weak balls strong

Post by Mongo » April 13th, 2019, 2:01 am

I got into an interesting conversation with one of my teammates about the advantages of drilling stronger balls weak and weaker balls strong....and when both have their advantages.

Personally, I'm really starting to feel that, for the most part, the weak ball/strong layout combo is better for most house shots. House shots are generally designed to provide built in friction and big balls, even with a weaker drill, are going to create a lot more transition. A weaker ball, even with a strong layout, is something you can keep in your hand longer and have a more consistent look throughout the session.

On the other hand, on sport shots, there is no built in hook, so a bigger core/stronger cover is going to help you blend out the shot. I would think a weaker layout will create a smoother motion and controllable breakpoint.

I'd really like to dig into this further and discuss. I could be totally wrong, but would like hear your opinions/experiences on playing with different layouts.
USBC Silver Certified Coach
JMerrell wrote:Mongo,
We need to work on getting that teddy bear body of yours more open throughout the approach.

User avatar
EricHartwell
Trusted Source
Trusted Source
Posts: 3770
Joined: April 5th, 2011, 12:24 am
Positive Axis Point: 4-3/4" and 1/2"up
Speed: 16 off hand
Rev Rate: 330
Axis Tilt: 12
Axis Rotation: 45
Heavy Oil Ball: Radical Tremendous
Medium Oil Ball: Motiv Villain, Hammer Nail, Brunswick True Motion
Light Oil Ball: Blue Hammer, Columbia Nitrous
Location: Michigan

Re: Drilling strong balls weak vs drilling weak balls strong

Post by EricHartwell » April 13th, 2019, 3:03 pm

Interesting topic.

Quite often weak balls have both weaker covers and weaker cores. I find this situation is even more true with the lighter weight equipment. So to put a Strong layout on one is necessary to get them to roll.
With the lighter weights the Strong covered balls have weaker cores. So to put a weaker layout on it the core is taken out of the equation and tougher sport shots get even tougher.
Mongo wrote:On the other hand, on sport shots, there is no built in hook, so a bigger core/stronger cover is going to help you blend out the shot. I would think a weaker layout will create a smoother motion and controllable breakpoint.
On shorter patterns yes. But on the longer patterns this will not work so good.

Many sport/challenge patterns are made tougher by a low volume of oil. Making them transition faster. Just witnessed this first hand in our state tournament doubles and singles block. With only 6 bowlers on a pair you were lucky to get through 3 frames without having to move. The pattern was long enough and with no free friction on the outside that anything weak could not recover.
Eric Hartwell

Right Handed
PAP 4.75" up 1/2"
45* rotation
12* tilt
330 rev rate
16 mph off hand

User avatar
Mongo
Certified Coach
Certified Coach
Posts: 471
Joined: March 13th, 2014, 5:33 am
THS Average: 225
Positive Axis Point: 4 1/2" over, 1 1/2" up
Speed: 18 MPH
Rev Rate: 375
Axis Tilt: 12
Axis Rotation: 80
Preferred Company: DV8/Radical

Re: Drilling strong balls weak vs drilling weak balls strong

Post by Mongo » April 13th, 2019, 8:29 pm

EricHartwell wrote:Interesting topic.

Quite often weak balls have both weaker covers and weaker cores. I find this situation is even more true with the lighter weight equipment. So to put a Strong layout on one is necessary to get them to roll.
With the lighter weights the Strong covered balls have weaker cores. So to put a weaker layout on it the core is taken out of the equation and tougher sport shots get even tougher.
On the weaker ball/strong layout combo, I was thinking house shots only. I'd argue that in about 80% of house shots, weaker balls are the way to go with all of the friction. In fact, I'm usually shocked when I see huge scores shot with big core balls in league. I rarely ever see a house pattern hold up that well.
Mongo wrote:On the other hand, on sport shots, there is no built in hook, so a bigger core/stronger cover is going to help you blend out the shot. I would think a weaker layout will create a smoother motion and controllable breakpoint.
Eric Hartwell wrote:On shorter patterns yes. But on the longer patterns this will not work so good.

Many sport/challenge patterns are made tougher by a low volume of oil. Making them transition faster. Just witnessed this first hand in our state tournament doubles and singles block. With only 6 bowlers on a pair you were lucky to get through 3 frames without having to move. The pattern was long enough and with no free friction on the outside that anything weak could not recover.
On the longer sport patterns, it tends to be light/long so you get more transition because the heads tend to go, but players are still throwing stronger balls because of the oil downlane.

Essentially, I was looking to compare these layouts on conditions where both are playable (i.e. < 40' and medium volume/house shots).
USBC Silver Certified Coach
JMerrell wrote:Mongo,
We need to work on getting that teddy bear body of yours more open throughout the approach.

Post Reply