Thank you for your advice. I have recently tried to undestand these two balls more. I've decided to plug the Radical Ridiculous and maybe put something like a low flare -layout for a broken down conditions to it. For the Hyper cell skid, I will make this my long&strong ball. The problem is that it is still little too snappy at the backend. Could be very useful ball if the roll would be more forward rather than 90 degrees left. Would it help any if I plug the current balance hole and redrill a new P1 hole instead to tame it little?gunso wrote:
Both of those balls should be much cleaner through the fronts then the other 2. I'd suggest throwing a wet 4000 on them or even polish and see if they don't give you the reaction you are looking for without plugging them first.
At least then you could describe the layout that is on them now, what is wrong with the motion and what you are looking for instead.
But I made new impulse purchase yesterday: 900Global Chemical X
Coverstock: S55™ Solid
Finish: 4000 Grit
Core: Pod™ Symmetric
Flare Potential: 3-4″
RG: 2.49
Diff: 0.035
This is to complement the Primo. When primo is hooking too much or I have to play too far left with it, I could use this to play strighter. I have used the Boo-Yah for this but there have been many situations where it encounters too much friction too early and loses carry. I think this should fit somewhere between these balls. BUT the question is should I hit the Chemical X with a control-layout (pin in RF or below) or just the benchmark since this should be little tamer ball than the Primo. The primo usually has a surface around 1000grit.
It has been too often lately that I have to throw somewhere at 4th arrow or more left (with Primo) in our local centers. It is hard for my style because the ball feeding machines starts to be in my way.