I was amazed at Mo's accuracy as confirmed by this study. Did you check out the layout in the drill angle section. (Track 919C) edited for terminology.Mo Pinel wrote:
Let's pay attention and not just spout off. When I say to treat an asym with an int. diff. < .008" like a symmetrical ball, I'm referring to the location of the PSA of the drilled ball. All the exact info in Blueprint's article are specific to each of those balls. In his conclusions, he points out that that is the case. He makes some generalities in his conclusions. I stand by my statement to treat asyms with int. diffs. < .008" as symmetrical balls. I will continue to espouse that position. The amount of total diff. has nothing to do with this issue. We can have both asyms and syms with all kinds of diffs. Blueprint's article does nothing to contradict my position. Amen, brother!
90* 5 3/4 55*
And Mo mostly did it by trial and error and watching ball reactions I think. (In the beginning anyway)